top of page

Chapter-by-Chapter Diagnostic
Review

Luis Gabriel R. Barretto, President's Lister, Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila

Maria Gloria Adan’s work on Hybrid: A Proposal for a New Form of Government in the Philippines, is a compelling read for individuals who are interested in politics especially more on the ideals on how we can make our government better. While the book is informative and simple to understand, I have also noticed some lapses on it that I would like to literate.

In Chapter 1, the author presents an effective introduction to the Hybrid Model which stresses that governmental innovation remains essential. It demonstrates effectively that the present governmental structure of the Philippines has established systemic inefficiencies. While the tale of the unintelligent voter has good claims, we cannot call the voters unintelligent for voting on the wrong people or candidates we think are right for the job. As stated, some voters are politically illiterate, but that doesn’t mean they are unintelligent. Some people in the Philippines grew up in different environments, some finished their education, and some did not. As said in Chapter One, it is a survival strategy to believe in the promises these candidates make and not have to think critically about it. The chapter supports the analysis of a different system well, but it could use a more comparative example other than Park Geun-hye to support its claims.

Chapter 2 explores a detailed historical assessment of governance obstacles in the country showing how colonial influences and political dynasties established the current administration. The chapter relies primarily on historical determinism by stating that altering the structural framework should solve the existing problems. The inclusion of socio-economic factors in the analysis would strengthen the overall argument.

Chapter 3 provides detailed information about the Hybrid Model by explaining its alignment between parliamentary and presidential structures. The model exhibits satisfactory flexibility as well as adaptability according to the analysis. The hybrid system proposal does not present actual evidence demonstrating the operational logic of its hybrid structural elements. The credibility of this chapter would benefit from analyzing hybrid models already implemented in other countries.

In Chapter 4 titled “Federalism and Its Role in a Hybrid Government” The book's discussion about political participation creates an engaging analysis about inclusive governance systems. The proposed mechanisms by the author to boost citizen involvement represent a strong point of her work. This paper fails to properly evaluate how practical these mechanisms would be in the current Philippine political infrastructure.

Chapter 5 successfully explains why institutional checks with accountability are significant elements for proper governance. The proposed regulatory structure presents an effective system to fight corruption effectively. The chapter fails to fully examine how the proposed model would tackle expected resistance from powerful political entities and how it would counteract those obstacles.

In Chapter 6, The Hybrid Model economic evaluation in this chapter shows foreign investment growth along national economic expansion. The discussion lacks enough information about how this model might solve issues stemming from regional differences in income as well as socioeconomic gaps. From the perspective of research readers and scholars, it is beneficial to examine the economic landscape through case studies of regimes implementing similar reforms in their current governance systems.

Chapter 7 investigates cultural elements in governance reforms by highlighting that local political systems must consider native values and traditions. People should applaud the awareness of Filipino communal values. The analysis should expand its scope to explain which conflicting cultural values create resistance against implementing the Hybrid Model.

In Chapter 8, The author delivers an in-depth description of all legal requirements needed to establish the Hybrid Model. The detailed legal evaluation fails to capture the intricate nature of changing the Philippines constitution adequately. Extended real-world timelines while addressing legal obstacles would strengthen this section better.

Chapter 9 provides critical knowledge regarding safety concerns related to the adoption of the Hybrid Model. The author presents workable solutions for potential obstacles that might arise. Certain solutions fail to specify their approach when dealing with political barriers and slow-moving bureaucracy. A comprehensive plan for risk management would lead to stronger improvements in the chapter content.

Lastly, Chapter 10 presents an intense appeal for transformation in the book's concluding segment. The author ends by strongly advocating the Hybrid Model should be taken seriously as a viable solution by all stakeholders. Better credibility in this argument would emerge if the author adopted a calmer tone that accepts the unknown aspects of proper implementation. 

Hybrid: A Proposal for a New Form of Government in the Philippines offers a great perspective on shaping our country’s governance through the Hybrid Model. This highlights the systematic flaws of the country's current political system and introduces a compelling new approach by introducing a new type of government in the Philippines, however, some lapses need to be revised. These are my general lapses; they’re based on my general understanding of the book and do not wish to hinder the author’s passion for striving for a better government in the Philippines. Despite all the lapses, Maria Gloria Adan’s passion for better governance is an eye-opener for young readers to have an open conversation about the future of the Philippine government.

Bachelor of Arts in Political Science

Maria Gloria Adan’s work on Hybrid: A Proposal for a New Form of Government in the Philippines, is a compelling read for individuals who are interested in politics especially more on the ideals on how we can make our government better. While the book is informative and simple to understand, I have also noticed some lapses on it that I would like to literate.

In Chapter 1, the author presents an effective introduction to the Hybrid Model which stresses that governmental innovation remains essential. It demonstrates effectively that the present governmental structure of the Philippines has established systemic inefficiencies. While the tale of the unintelligent voter has good claims, we cannot call the voters unintelligent for voting on the wrong people or candidates we think are right for the job. As stated, some voters are politically illiterate, but that doesn’t mean they are unintelligent. Some people in the Philippines grew up in different environments, some finished their education, and some did not. As said in Chapter One, it is a survival strategy to believe in the promises these candidates make and not have to think critically about it. The chapter supports the analysis of a different system well, but it could use a more comparative example other than Park Geun-hye to support its claims.

Chapter 2 explores a detailed historical assessment of governance obstacles in the country showing how colonial influences and political dynasties established the current administration. The chapter relies primarily on historical determinism by stating that altering the structural framework should solve the existing problems. The inclusion of socio-economic factors in the analysis would strengthen the overall argument.

Chapter 3 provides detailed information about the Hybrid Model by explaining its alignment between parliamentary and presidential structures. The model exhibits satisfactory flexibility as well as adaptability according to the analysis. The hybrid system proposal does not present actual evidence demonstrating the operational logic of its hybrid structural elements. The credibility of this chapter would benefit from analyzing hybrid models already implemented in other countries.

In Chapter 4 titled “Federalism and Its Role in a Hybrid Government” The book's discussion about political participation creates an engaging analysis about inclusive governance systems. The proposed mechanisms by the author to boost citizen involvement represent a strong point of her work. This paper fails to properly evaluate how practical these mechanisms would be in the current Philippine political infrastructure.

Chapter 5 successfully explains why institutional checks with accountability are significant elements for proper governance. The proposed regulatory structure presents an effective system to fight corruption effectively. The chapter fails to fully examine how the proposed model would tackle expected resistance from powerful political entities and how it would counteract those obstacles.

In Chapter 6, The Hybrid Model economic evaluation in this chapter shows foreign investment growth along national economic expansion. The discussion lacks enough information about how this model might solve issues stemming from regional differences in income as well as socioeconomic gaps. From the perspective of research readers and scholars, it is beneficial to examine the economic landscape through case studies of regimes implementing similar reforms in their current governance systems.

Chapter 7 investigates cultural elements in governance reforms by highlighting that local political systems must consider native values and traditions. People should applaud the awareness of Filipino communal values. The analysis should expand its scope to explain which conflicting cultural values create resistance against implementing the Hybrid Model.

In Chapter 8, The author delivers an in-depth description of all legal requirements needed to establish the Hybrid Model. The detailed legal evaluation fails to capture the intricate nature of changing the Philippines constitution adequately. Extended real-world timelines while addressing legal obstacles would strengthen this section better.

Chapter 9 provides critical knowledge regarding safety concerns related to the adoption of the Hybrid Model. The author presents workable solutions for potential obstacles that might arise. Certain solutions fail to specify their approach when dealing with political barriers and slow-moving bureaucracy. A comprehensive plan for risk management would lead to stronger improvements in the chapter content.

Lastly, Chapter 10 presents an intense appeal for transformation in the book's concluding segment. The author ends by strongly advocating the Hybrid Model should be taken seriously as a viable solution by all stakeholders. Better credibility in this argument would emerge if the author adopted a calmer tone that accepts the unknown aspects of proper implementation.

Hybrid: A Proposal for a New Form of Government in the Philippines offers a great perspective on shaping our country’s governance through the Hybrid Model. This highlights the systematic flaws of the country's current political system and introduces a compelling new approach by introducing a new type of government in the Philippines, however, some lapses need to be revised. These are my general lapses; they’re based on my general understanding of the book and do not wish to hinder the author’s passion for striving for a better government in the Philippines. Despite all the lapses, Maria Gloria Adan’s passion for better governance is an eye-opener for young readers to have an open conversation about the future of the Philippine government.

bottom of page